Methods And Apparatus For Data Collection

ABSTRACT

Systems and techniques for directing data collection. Upon an initial data collection, the uncertainty of all or of a portion or portions of the collected data is evaluated. The collected data may be associated with a region, with portions of the collected data associated with subregions. Further data collection, including changes to or refinement of collection techniques, is undertaken based on evaluations of the uncertainty. Further data collection may be undertaken only for portions of the data for which uncertainty exceeds a threshold. Uncertainty evaluation may be performed at least in part using a model. The model may be an initial hypothesis model, and the model may be optimized as further data is collected, and the optimized model may be used to guide further data collection techniques, with iterations of data collection and model optimization being carried out concurrently.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

One or more embodiments of the present invention relate generally tosystems and techniques for data collection. More particular, embodimentsof the invention relate to directing data collection based at least inpart on evaluations of the uncertainty associated with differentportions of collected data.

BACKGROUND

Many activities depend on the collection of large and complex bodies ofdata. The data is processed and results of the processing are used toguide the activities. The collection of data in connection with many ofthese activities is itself complex and expensive. In one example,undersea oil drilling requires the collection of data to identify likelylocations for oil deposits, because undersea drilling is enormouslyexpensive. Energy concerns collect seismic data, which is then processedto identify locations of prospective deposits. One common datacollection method is the towing of a hydrophone array by a ship. A shipmay tow a two-dimensional array of hydrophones spaced approximately 25meters apart on 1 to 16 trailed streamers. Every 15 seconds or so, anair cannon is fired into the water, creating an acoustic wave thatpropagates through the water and into the earth. Reflections fromvarious surface and subsurface boundaries cause echoes that reflectback, and the echoes captured by each hydrophone in the array arerecorded. The recording of a single hydrophone over time appears as atrace, and the collection of traces for a single firing of a cannon iscalled a common shot gather, or shot. As a ship moves, a large set ofspatially overlapping shots is recorded. Depending on the survey regionto be imaged, such data collection may take a month or more and isdesigned to achieve maximal coverage of an area to be imaged. Usually aship passes back and forth over an area at a slow speed, performing tensof thousands of shots. A data collection ship may cost on the order of$1 million per day.

SUMMARY

In one embodiment of the invention, an apparatus comprises at least oneprocessor and memory storing computer program code. Execution of thecomputer program code by a processor causes the apparatus to performactions comprising at least evaluating uncertainty associated with atleast one subset of a set of collected data, and, if the at least onesubset of the set of collected data is characterized by uncertaintyexceeding a specified threshold, directing additional data collection torefine the at least one subset of the set of data.

In another embodiment of the invention, a method comprises evaluatinguncertainty associated with at least one subset of a set of collecteddata, and, if the at least one subset of the set of collected data ischaracterized by uncertainty exceeding a specified threshold, directingadditional data collection to refine the at least one subset of the setof data.

In another embodiment of the invention, a computer readable mediumstores computer program code. Execution of the computer program code bya processor configures an apparatus to perform actions comprising atleast evaluating uncertainty associated with at least one subset of aset of collected data, and, if the at least one subset of the set ofcollected data is characterized by uncertainty exceeding a specifiedthreshold, directing additional data collection to refine the at leastone subset of the set of data.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS

FIGS. 1 and 2 illustrate mechanisms for data collection that can bedirected using one or more embodiments of the present invention;

FIG. 3 illustrates a procedure for data collection according to anembodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 4 illustrates a process for directing data collection according toan embodiment of the present invention;

FIGS. 5 and 6 illustrate additional details of directing data collectionaccording to an embodiment of the present invention

FIG. 7 illustrates a process of model optimization according to anembodiment of the present invention; and

FIG. 8 illustrates a system for directing data collection according toan embodiment of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particularembodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. Asused herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended toinclude the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicatesotherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises”and/or “comprising,” when used in this specification, specify thepresence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements,and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of oneor more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements,components, and/or groups thereof.

Embodiments of the present invention recognize that the typical areaover which data is collected using mechanism such as those describedabove is not uniform, and in cases of oil exploration, areas rich in oildeposits tend to be more complex. Therefore, the areas of most interestare more complex and tend to require the most data gathering, whilesimpler areas also tend to be areas of less interest. In addition,simpler areas inherently require less data gathering than do complexareas. A uniform survey of areas of varying complexity will thereforecause needless expense for surveying of simple areas, or insufficientdata gathering for surveying of complex areas. Embodiments of thepresent invention therefore use evaluations of uncertainty in the datathat has been gathered to determine the regions for which additionaldata gathering needs to be performed. Embodiments of the invention alsoprovide users with information that allows them to determine the areasin which sufficient data collection has been performed and the areas inwhich additional data collection needs to be performed. Embodiments ofthe invention also allow users to direct additional data collection inareas in which such collection should be performed.

FIG. 1 illustrates a mechanism 100 for data collection that may bedirected according to one or more embodiments of the present invention.A discharge 102 of an air cannon into a body of water creates acousticwaves, here illustrated as 106, 108, and 110, that bounce off reflectivesurfaces 112, 114, and 116 and are captured by receivers 118A, . . . ,118E. The acoustic waves captured by the receivers, such as hydrophones,are processed to provide images of the reflective surfaces, which are orprovide insight into, geological features beneath the surface of thesoil, which in turn lies beneath the water.

FIG. 2 illustrates a ship 200 that tows an array 201 of streamers 202A,. . . , 202O, with each of the streamers comprising a set of hydrophonesspaced apart, at a separation of approximately 25 meters. The array maybe on the order of 5 km long and 1 km across, and the assembly is towedover an area of interest. As noted above, a great deal of data needs tobe collected, requiring many shots and many passes over the area ofinterest, to provide reliable data for oil exploration. One or moreembodiments of the present invention direct the collection of data bytaking data from an initial pass or set of passes, analyzing the data interms of uncertainty, and directing further passes, which may bemodified as needed, over areas exhibiting uncertainty. The new data isfurther analyzed and further additional passes may be made, until asufficient level of certainty is achieved. FIG. 2 further illustrates amore distant view of the ship 200 and the array 201 as the ship tows thearray 201 along a path 206.

FIG. 3 illustrates an exemplary search pattern 300 that may be achievedusing one or more embodiments of the present invention. An initialpattern 302 is performed, using relatively wide spacing, to collect aninitial set of data. The initial pattern 302 may cover both simple andcomplex areas (whose relative simplicity and complexity are typicallynot known, or not well known, before the initial search takes place).The initial set of data is processed, with the processing typicallyincluding imaging. The processing and imaging may use one or more modelswhose general structure may be known in the applicable art, such as oilexploration, reservoir modeling, structure damage detection, and thelike, and the one or more models may be refined as needed using one ormore embodiments of the present invention. The models are used to directthe data collection and the data is in turn used to enhance the models,with each of the data collection and the modeling being improved by theother.

FIG. 4 illustrates a process 400 of data collection according to anembodiment of the present invention. The exemplary process 400 describedhere relates to data relating to subsurface structure information, butit will be recognized that embodiments of the present invention may beused in connection with any number of data collection operations inwhich the uncertainty of data that is gathered can influence datagathering techniques. During the data collection process 400, a completesimulation is performed with a hypothesis model, carrying out a forwardacoustic wave propagation pass to generate simulated trace data.Sensitivity analysis and error minimization are performed, and modelparameters may be adjusted to minimize an error between collected dataand simulated data. A separate model optimization process, illustratedin FIG. 7 and discussed in greater detail below, may be performed.

At 402, data collection is performed, and the data is stored in datastorage 404. At step 406, data processing and error analysis areperformed. At step 408, subsurface structure quality and uncertaintyanalysis are performed. An evaluation is performed at step 409 todetermine if refinement of the data is needed. If refinement of the datais needed, the process proceeds to step 410 and a new data collectionplan to achieve the refinement is generated. The data collection planmay, for example, designate areas in which more detailed surveying is tobe performed and may specify various techniques to be used. In cases inwhich acoustic wave collection is to be performed, the data collectionplan may designate changes such as increased shot frequency, higher datasampling rates, new angles for positioning of the cannon so as tocollect data from waves penetrating the surface at different angles, andso on. The data collection plan may also specify the density of apattern of passes, the number and direction of passes, and any otherrelevant information.

The process then returns to step 402 and additional data collection isperformed according to the new data collection plan. The data is againanalyzed and if refinement is needed, a further new data plan is createdand further data collection is performed. When no refinement is needed,either after initial data collection and analysis, or after a lateriteration, the process ends at step 412.

Additional details of the data processing and error analysis performedat step 406, and the subsurface structure quality and uncertaintyanalysis performed at step 408, are presented at FIGS. 5 and 6,respectively, and discussed below. FIG. 5 illustrates a process 500 thatmay be performed at step 406 of the process 400 of FIG. 4. At step 502,collected data D^(c) is retrieved from data storage 404. At step 504,the forward propagation portion of the data is simulated with ahypothesis model M(α₀, α₁, α₂, . . . ) to generate shot data D^(s). Atstep 506, an error value is computed for the set of data by comparingthe collected data with the model, using the formula

$E = {\frac{\sum\limits_{k = 1}^{N}{{D_{k}^{c} - D_{k}^{s}}}^{n}}{N}.}$

At step 508, a sensitivity analysis and error minimization Min E=f(M(α₀,α₁, α₂, . . . ), D^(C)) is performed to yield model parameters thatminimize the error: M*(α₀, α₁, α₂, . . . ); E*. These model parametersare then used to perform subsurface quality and uncertainty analysis.

FIG. 6 illustrates a process 600 of subsurface quality and uncertaintyanalysis according to an embodiment of the present invention. At step602, the sensitivity and error values generated by the process 500 arereceived. At step 604, a reverse path of reverse time migration (RTM) isprocessed with a current model to generate an image. The model may beiteratively optimized along with the data collection process, asillustrated at FIG. 7 and described in additional detail below. At step606, subsurface structure quality analysis is performed. In oneexemplary case in which embodiments of the invention may be used, theimage is compared against a set of structure patterns associated with ahigh likelihood for the presence of oil. If it can be clearlyestablished that the region does not have high oil potential, theanalysis can be ended, but if the region, or a portion of the region,has high oil potential, an uncertainty analysis is performed at step608. One exemplary mechanism for the uncertainty analysis is to computean average error E_(a) in a moving window, such as a two-dimensionalwindow, over a region of interest. The window may move in incrementswith each incremental movement of the window defining a subregion. Asubregion is uncertain if the value of E_(a) exceeds a threshold. Foreach image, an error measure may be calculated between measured seismicdata and data generated by the model by “shooting” the model usingtechniques familiar to those skilled in the art. Error measures are thenused to generate a probability associated with each model and the errormeasure is used to inform the data collection process as to whichregions have low degrees of uncertainty or variability and which regionshave high degrees of uncertainty or variability relating to subsurfacestructures of interest. At step 610, the results of the uncertaintyanalysis are used for the evaluation step 409 of FIG. 4.

The process 400 continues with the result of the uncertainty analysis,with a determination being made if further refinement of one or moresubregions is needed, and if further refinement is needed, the process400 proceeds as described above.

FIG. 7 illustrates a process 700 of model optimization according to oneor more embodiments of the present invention. At step 702, an initialhypothetical model is specified. At step 704, a modeling process isperformed, such as full waveform immersion (FWI), using stored data suchas the data 404 of FIG. 4. At step 706, model quality and errordistribution analysis and sensitivity analysis are performed. If theanalysis indicates that the model does not need refinement, the processterminates at step 708. If the analysis indicates that the model needsrefinement, the process proceeds to step 710 and refinement requirementsare generated, such as requirements for subspaces and requirementsrelating to the data needed. The process then proceeds to step 712 andan evaluation is made as to whether sufficient data for furtherrefinement is available. If no more data collection is needed, theprocess returns to step 704, repeating the modeling process with dataavailable in data storage 406. If additional data collection is needed,the process proceeds to step 716 and additional data is collected usingthe process 400. The process 400 need not be completed before datacollected by the process is used. Instead, new data may be collected andthe data used to refine the model, with the refined model being used inturn, with refined data being used at successive iterations of theprocess 700 and refined models being used at successive iterations ofthe process 400. Such successive iterations may be continued with oneprocess terminating when its goal is met. The goals of each of theprocesses 400 and 700 may be influenced by the needs of the otherprocess, so that each process may continue as long as it can achieveimprovements at a desired level of efficiency, so long as thoseimprovements can benefit the other process.

FIG. 8 illustrates a data processing system 800 that may be used tocarry out one or more embodiments of the present invention. The system800 comprises a processor 802, memory 804, and storage 806,communicating over a bus 808. The system 800 may employ data 810 andprograms 812, residing in storage 806 and transferred to memory 804 asneeded for execution by the processor 802. Included in the data 810 maybe a model database 814, which may store one or more initial models andsubsequent refinements of the model or models. Also included in the data810 may be a data collection database 816 for receiving and storingcollected data and a comparison database storing data relating tocharacteristics of interest against which collected data may becompared. Included in the programs 812 may be a data collection module818, an initial model creation module 820, and a model optimizationmodule 822. The various modules 816, 818, and 820 may cause the carryingout of operations such as those described above in relation to theprocesses 400, 500, 600, and 700 of FIGS. 4-7, respectively.

As will be appreciated by one skilled in the art, aspects of the presentinvention may be embodied as a system, method or computer programproduct. Accordingly, aspects of the present invention may take the formof an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment(including firmware, resident software, micro-code, etc.) or anembodiment combining software and hardware aspects that may allgenerally be referred to herein as a “circuit,” “module” or “system.”Furthermore, aspects of the present invention may take the form of acomputer program product embodied in one or more computer readablemedium(s) having computer readable program code embodied thereon.

Any combination of one or more computer readable medium(s) may beutilized. The computer readable medium may be a computer readable signalmedium or a computer readable storage medium. A computer readablestorage medium may be, for example, but not limited to, an electronic,magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system,apparatus, or device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. Morespecific examples (a non-exhaustive list) of the computer readablestorage medium would include the following: an electrical connectionhaving one or more wires, a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, arandom access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasableprogrammable read-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory), an optical fiber,a portable compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), an optical storagedevice, a magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination of theforegoing. In the context of this document, a computer readable storagemedium may be any tangible medium that can contain, or store a programfor use by or in connection with an instruction execution system,apparatus, or device.

A computer readable signal medium may include a propagated data signalwith computer readable program code embodied therein, for example, inbaseband or as part of a carrier wave. Such a propagated signal may takeany of a variety of forms, including, but not limited to,electro-magnetic, optical, or any suitable combination thereof. Acomputer readable signal medium may be any computer readable medium thatis not a computer readable storage medium and that can communicate,propagate, or transport a program for use by or in connection with aninstruction execution system, apparatus, or device.

Program code embodied on a computer readable medium may be transmittedusing any appropriate medium, including but not limited to wireless,wireline, optical fiber cable, RF, or the like, or any suitablecombination of the foregoing.

Computer program code for carrying out operations for aspects of thepresent invention may be written in any combination of one or moreprogramming languages, including an object oriented programming languagesuch as Java, Smalltalk, C++ or the like and conventional proceduralprogramming languages, such as the “C” programming language or similarprogramming languages. The program code may execute entirely on theuser's computer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alonesoftware package, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remotecomputer or entirely on the remote computer or server. In the latterscenario, the remote computer may be connected to the user's computerthrough any type of network, including a local area network (LAN) or awide area network (WAN), or the connection may be made to an externalcomputer (for example, through the Internet using an Internet ServiceProvider).

Various embodiments of the present invention improve over conventionaltechniques by directing data collection using an evaluation ofuncertainty associated with already collected data. An initial lessdetailed collection may be performed over a large region, and this lessdetailed collection need not be refined for subregions for which theuncertainty is sufficiently low. For subregions for which the dataexhibits a higher uncertainty, further or refined data collection can beperformed. A model may be used to determine the uncertainty, with aninitial hypothesis model being used at first, and with this model beingiteratively optimized using refined data as further refinements to datacollection are made. In turn, further refinements to data collection maybe made based on the optimized model.

The description of the present invention has been presented for purposesof illustration and description, but is not intended to be exhaustive orlimited to the invention in the form disclosed. Many modifications andvariations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the artwithout departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. Theembodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain theprinciples of the invention and the practical application, and to enableothers of ordinary skill in the art to understand the invention forvarious embodiments with various modifications as are suited to theparticular use contemplated.

1-14. (canceled)
 15. An apparatus comprising: at least one processor;memory storing computer program code; wherein the memory storing thecomputer program code is configured to, with the at least one processor,cause the apparatus to at least: evaluate uncertainty associated with atleast one subset of a set of collected data; and if the at least onesubset of the set of collected data is characterized by uncertaintyexceeding a specified threshold, direct additional data collection torefine the at least one subset of the set of data.
 16. The apparatus ofclaim 15, wherein the set of collected data comprises a result of aninitial collection and is characterized by a relatively low level ofdetail.
 17. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein evaluating uncertaintycomprises performing quality and error distribution analysis for atleast one subset of the set of collected data.
 18. The apparatus ofclaim 17, wherein the set of collected data comprises data collectedover a larger region and each of the subsets of collected data comprisesdata collected over a subregion of the larger region.
 19. The apparatusof claim 15, wherein directing additional data collection comprisesdirecting specified mechanisms of data collection.
 20. The apparatus ofclaim 19, wherein at least one of the specified mechanisms of datacollection comprises a higher density of data collection relative to theinitial data collection.
 21. The apparatus of claim 15, whereinevaluating uncertainty comprises: generating processed data using amodel to process the collected data; computing an error for theprocessed data; and performing sensitivity analysis and errorminimization for the processed data.
 22. The apparatus of claim 21,wherein evaluating uncertainty further comprises iteratively optimizingthe model as further data is collected.
 23. The apparatus of claim 15,wherein evaluating uncertainty comprises comparing an error valueagainst a threshold, and wherein a subset of data is designated asuncertain if its error value exceeds a threshold.
 24. The apparatus ofclaim 23, wherein the error value is an average error value computedover a subset of data defined by a moving window.
 25. An apparatuscomprising: at least one processor; memory storing computer programcode; wherein the memory storing the computer program code is configuredto, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus to at least:perform a modeling process using stored data; perform at least one ofmodel quality analysis, error distribution analysis, and sensitivityanalysis; determine, based at least in part on the at least one of themodel quality analysis, error distribution analysis, and sensitivityanalysis, if the model requires refinement; and iteratively refine themodel, wherein refining the model comprises collecting and storingadditional data, and wherein collection and storage of additional datais also iteratively performed, with collection and storage of additionaldata being refined as the model is refined.
 26. The apparatus of claim25, wherein refining the model continues until a specified level goal ismet.
 27. The apparatus of claim 25, wherein refining the model continuesso long as improvements can be achieved at a desired level ofefficiency.
 28. The apparatus of claim 25, wherein the modeling processis a full waveform immersion process.
 29. A computer readable mediumstoring a program of instructions, execution of which by a processorconfigures an apparatus to at least: evaluate uncertainty associatedwith at least one subset of a set of collected data; and if the at leastone subset of the set of collected data is characterized by uncertaintyexceeding a specified threshold, direct additional data collection torefine the at least one subset of the set of data.
 30. The computerreadable medium of claim 29, wherein the set of collected data comprisesa result of an initial collection and is characterized by a relativelylow level of detail.
 31. The computer readable medium of claim 29,wherein evaluating uncertainty comprises performing quality and errordistribution analysis for at least one subset of the set of collecteddata.
 32. The computer readable medium of claim 31, wherein the set ofcollected data comprises data collected over a larger region and each ofthe subsets of collected data comprises data collected over a subregionof the larger region.
 33. The computer readable medium of claim 15,wherein directing additional data collection comprises directingspecified mechanisms of data collection.
 34. The computer readablemedium of claim 32, wherein at least one of the specified mechanisms ofdata collection comprises a higher density of data collection relativeto the initial data collection.